seems to me mr. Swann is into dissinformation. he gives out some twisted truths in his books, but ommits other quite obvious ones at the same time.
derrikdavid(September 18, 2008 at 8:03 am)
The government doesn't always give worthwhile pursuits their due attention.Sometimes the government gives much attention to dead-end fields.
bigdog49094(September 4, 2008 at 4:27 am)
LOL angry did not know you were so connected with such high above top secret clearances to know everything the US Gov't is doing or haws done.
SNAPMANDU(August 20, 2008 at 3:21 am)
Your an idiot!
peteralexander9(August 6, 2008 at 12:41 am)
TERRIBLE INTERVIEW! 8 of the 10 minutes of Part 1 were totally wasted by the stupid interviewer...
angryDAnerd(August 2, 2008 at 7:37 pm)
Of course, there is very little scientific evidence for any of this. Obviously, the government found nothing useful from these programs, the fact that the government no longer has interest in the field demonstrates that it is a complete dead end.
A whole bunch of conspiracy nuts/scientologists/cultists will no doubt vote me down. Instead of trying to ignore me or dismiss me, why don't you show me some peer reviewed EVIDENCE that remote viewing is effective?
RideMyBMW(July 7, 2008 at 2:20 am)
"this is the WORST Art Bell interview I've heard" - keyWTF ? Dude, Art Bell`s the friggin master! I liked it. Thought it was a good interview.
widviewer(June 2, 2008 at 10:49 am)
how do u remote view
goodsnservices(April 23, 2008 at 3:52 am)
Funny. Ingo says he doesn't know why he should be singled out! I can answer that one. He's the person who figured out how remote viewing works, what works best, and what blocks viewing when people try to do it. For that, he is definitely singular. People trying rv should always go back to his techniques because they work when nothing else does.
Hexatyrant(April 10, 2008 at 1:28 pm)
No they wont Mrduffy,We still wouldnt have a clue, If that was the case then (F.T) it would be the case now (Present.Tense).And it would have been the case in the past.1st person: "See i told you so, I new that would happen!".Last person: "Why did you have to prove it?".1st person: "Because it was only an opinion, until I made it a Fact!".Last person "I agreed your opinion!".
J90shero(February 26, 2008 at 7:37 pm)
Pen and Teller. Are you kidding me. That shows where you're intelligence levels at
ssshjsd(February 25, 2008 at 7:08 pm)
a skeptic is somebody who is skeptical, a good person to write a magazine like skeptic. a believer is somebody who believes. If your a believer why dont you believe is skeptasism. Is a believer not somebody who believes everything. Idiot!, Dont use words you dont understand. PS skeptics do believe they just dont believe everything, they need evidence. if you think you should believe without evidence please reply.
